Дата публикации: 07.08.2023
THE CONCEPT OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
Atirkhan Nurdaulet Kairatuly
Master of Law Astana International University
Abstract: Written evidence plays a crucial role in civil proceedings, serving as a foundation for establishing facts, presenting arguments, and aiding in the pursuit of justice. This paper explores the general concept of written evidence in civil proceedings, including its importance, types, admissibility criteria, and challenges associated with its presentation. Additionally, it examines the evolving landscape of electronic evidence and its impact on the traditional understanding of written evidence. Understanding the significance and complexities of written evidence is essential for legal practitioners, judges, and scholars involved in civil litigation. Civil proceedings are governed by the fundamental principle of fair and impartial adjudication, where written evidence plays a central role.
Keywords: civil proceedings, written evidence, evidence, documents, courts
Written evidence encompasses a broad range of documents, including contracts, correspondence, expert reports, financial records, and various forms of documentary evidence. This paper aims to elucidate the general concept of written evidence, shedding light on its importance, admissibility criteria, and challenges encountered during its presentation in civil proceedings. Written evidence serves as a means to record and preserve information, providing a reliable source of proof and aiding in the establishment of facts. It allows parties to articulate their positions, present arguments, and support their claims or defenses. Written evidence ensures clarity, consistency, and transparency, enabling judges to make well-informed decisions based on the available information. This category encompasses tangible documents such as contracts, invoices, medical records, photographs, and emails, which directly relate to the case at hand. Documentary evidence is highly influential in civil proceedings, as it often provides concrete proof of events, actions, or agreements.: Expert reports contain opinions or analyses provided by qualified professionals in relevant fields. These reports contribute valuable technical or specialized knowledge, assisting the court in understanding complex matters. They may be particularly relevant in cases involving scientific, financial, or technical issues. Affidavits are sworn statements or declarations made by individuals with firsthand knowledge of the relevant facts. Affidavits allow parties to present evidence without the need for witnesses to testify in person, streamlining the proceedings and reducing the burden on the court. To ensure the reliability and fairness of the evidence presented, courts establish admissibility criteria. These criteria often include relevance, authenticity, hearsay exceptions, and the best evidence rule. Relevance requires that the evidence has a logical connection to the issues in dispute. Authenticity ensures that the evidence is genuine and has not been tampered with. Hearsay exceptions permit the admission of statements made out of court under certain circumstances. The best evidence rule dictates that the original document should be produced if its content is in question, rather than a secondary or hearsay representation. Determining the authenticity of written evidence can be challenging, as digital technology allows for easier manipulation and forgery. Courts must employ rigorous methods, such as expert analysis or digital forensics, to verify the authenticity of electronically generated or transmitted evidence. b. Evidentiary Weight: Judges need to assess the probative value and credibility of written evidence. Factors such as the source's reliability, the existence of conflicting evidence, and the context in which the evidence was produced all influence the weight assigned to a particular piece of written evidence.
Written evidence may involve technical or legal jargon that could be challenging for non-experts to understand. Courts must strike a balance between ensuring access to justice and maintaining fairness by providing appropriate assistance to parties who may struggle to comprehend complex written evidence. The digital age has given rise to the proliferation of electronic evidence, presenting both opportunities and challenges in civil proceedings. Electronic evidence includes emails, text messages, social media posts, computer-generated records, and other digital documents. The unique characteristics of electronic evidence raise additional considerations for its admissibility and presentation. Ensuring the authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence can be more complex than with traditional written evidence. Techniques such as metadata analysis, hash values, digital signatures, and chain of custody protocols are employed to establish the reliability and veracity of electronic evidence. Electronic evidence requires specialized techniques for preservation and retrieval. Courts and parties must address issues such as data storage formats, encryption, data security, and the potential for data loss or alteration. Procedures must be in place to ensure the admissibility and accessibility of electronic evidence throughout the litigation process. The handling and presentation of electronic evidence often require technical expertise. Lawyers, judges, and other legal professionals need to develop a working understanding of digital technologies and data management to effectively navigate electronic evidence in civil proceedings. Collaboration with digital forensic experts may be necessary to ensure the accurate interpretation and presentation of electronic evidence. Electronic evidence frequently contains personal and sensitive information. Balancing the need for evidence with privacy and data protection concerns poses challenges in civil proceedings. Courts must consider appropriate safeguards and redaction methods to protect the privacy rights of individuals while maintaining the integrity of the evidence. As technology continues to evolve, the landscape of written evidence in civil proceedings will undergo further transformation. Artificial intelligence, blockchain, and other emerging technologies have the potential to impact the generation, storage, and presentation of written evidence. Courts and legal practitioners must adapt to these advancements by developing frameworks, guidelines, and standards to address the unique challenges and opportunities presented by these evolving technologies.
Conclusion: Written evidence serves as a cornerstone of civil proceedings, providing a means to establish facts, present arguments, and pursue justice. The types of written evidence, including documentary evidence, expert reports, and affidavits, play distinct roles in shaping legal outcomes. However, challenges related to authenticity, evidentiary weight, and the emergence of electronic evidence must be carefully addressed. As technology continues to advance, the legal system must adapt to effectively handle electronic evidence and navigate the complexities associated with its presentation. By understanding the general concept of written evidence and staying abreast of technological advancements, legal professionals can ensure the fair and effective administration of civil justice.
Sergun A. K Sudebnye dokazatel'stva. Grazhdanskoe processual'noe pravo Rossii. Uchebnik pod redakciej M.S. SHakaryan.-M., 2006.-
Murphy P.A. Practical approach to evidence. 3-erd ed, L.,1988, P 11
«Best practices for authenticating digital evidence». https://coloradoorpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Best-Practices-forAuthenticating-Digital-Evidence-1.pdf
Evaluation of the admissibility of written evidence in civil and administrative proceedings Shkurova Polina Dmitrievna (Post-graduate student of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) - p. 43-52
Yarkov V.V. Elektronnoe pravosudie i printsipy tsivilisticheskogo protsessa [Electronic Justice and Principles of Civil Procedure]. Zakon = Law, 2015, no. 3. (In Russian) - P. 43-49
Mueller C.B., Kirkpatrick L.C. Evidence. Boston, New York, Toronto, London, 1995. P.4. https://www.wklegaledu.com/File%20Library/Unassigned/Mueller-Look-Inside Pages-Final-1-29.pdf