Дата публикации: 20.03.2022
Tulzhanova Karlygash Turak-Serikovna
Master’s Degree Student
KAZUIRWL named after Ablai Khan
The contemporary era created its “new world scheme” with “brand new economy”. Capitalism resulted in mixing cultural and linguistic backgrounds to get new trends and tendencies. What this implies is that capitalism has been rebuilt on a worldwide scale, and individuals of broadly distinctive social and etymological foundations have been tossed into contact more than ever some time recently. Social and phonetic contact may happen within the streams of data and mass media, as well as within the streams of genuine individuals in relocation and tourism. Given the ubiquity of social and phonetic contact, mergers and crossovers, it is obvious that there ought to be a solid intrigued in Intercultural Communication, both exterior and interior the scholarly world. Linguistics as a science makes two key commitments to the ponder of Intercultural Communication.
Keywords: intercultural communication; culture; language; contextual variations.
A significant culture belongs to this cultural work, which is often considered the privilege of the elite or wealthy people: choreography, harmony, song, famous sources and expressive skill. These events in some cases are formalized equally as international, due to the fact that they seem to have every chance of being appreciated by society in other areas, from other cultures, at different stages of the period. Their evolved significance is also timeless spiritual. In order to preserve these cultural values, public categories are created by museums, symphony halls and theaters. Essentially, the institutes devote directions, projects, including unified faculties, to the study of the nuances of significant culture.
In contrast to a significant culture, there is a low level of culture, which belongs to the work of non-elite people: melodic clips, game TV shows, competent rivalry, races in mass cars, drawing skill, electric current TV shows on TV also in this way. Usually, low-culture studies were immoral for thorough research, also for this reason not to act in any way in the role of special interest for the purpose of museums or institutions. The cultural meanings laid down in this work were in no way a spiritual letter, a timeless letter.
The prestige, displayed in contrast to a significant also low culture, shows tension in Western social concepts. But in the past decades, this difference is a reason to disappear. Rapid social change has forced institutions to change their own politician, but also have an impact in such a case, just as I explore intercultural interaction. By way of example, the riotous 1960s gave the institute a new strong interest in folk studies, including African American studies and the hardships of girls. The given field of study was in no way based on the previously existing differences among the significant also low culture. More precisely, they brought their own investment into the newest worldview base, justifying the legitimacy of other cultural configurations, which usually belonged to the group of low culture, but were now considered equally as a multiple level of culture. Because of this elite opinion in culture, the difference between "high culture" and "low culture" led to a rethinking of low culture as well as social culture. “The popular level of culture belongs to these concepts or relics, which are shared by most of the people and which most people know about” (p. 21). In accordance with this regulation, television broadcasts, melody clips, YouTube, Disney, advertisements, TV series are also common magazine's concepts of public culture. On the contrary, harmony and choreography are not characterized in any way as a priest-level of culture, due to the fact that most people do not have every chance to find out almost everything about them without examining them in any way. In a similar way, the prevailing level of culture is often viewed as equally populist, including the figures of the current culture, which are being made common among the people and for the people.
We do not often believe that our individual relationships have every chance of causing the loss of our nationality or adaptation to other groups, but not all cultures, without exception, admit or prefer all relationships without exception. In the case of Frederic Minviel, the differences among the Netherlands and France emphasize certain difficulties with the aim of intercultural relations, however, there is also dignity for the formation of intercultural relations, since someone who has studied Dutch speech also currently exists in the Netherlands.
Equally How can we improve relationships with peoples, which differ from us according to the year, national adaptation, faith, class? Think about your comrades, which differ from you with different methods. Equal How did your grace have the honor to meet them? The unit of this relationship is different with these, which are characterized by uniformity? For what reason do I form relationships with some peoples, but with others - is absent? It May Seem At First Sight, there is some truth in two sayings: "Birds flock together" and "Opposites attract."
What is the importance of communication in intercultural relationships? Also, how does communication (social, general historical, socio-political) have a great influence on our relationship? In this guide, I will study the merits and the difficulties of intercultural relationships, we will study, as well as how relationships are formed with the course of the period, we will also find certain civilized differences in the formation and maintenance of relationships. Throughout the whole leader, I will emphasize the dialectical place of view in intercultural relationships - as well as friendly, thus also romantic. Contextual difficulties are on par with separate relationship difficulties, for this reason, for the purpose of any given this, I will explore contextual difficulties.
There are all, without exception, more abilities for the purpose of connecting with peoples from other civilizations through the Internet, as well as an increasing civilized diversity in many schools and in workers' districts, but the latest survey demonstrates that current college freshmen are less interested in getting to know peoples that differ from theirs.  In sample surveys of the younger generation, society has repeatedly said that they are disclosed for the purpose of intercultural romantic relationships, but for the purpose of certain companies, the pace of intercultural dating is clearly similar, as well as the Twentieth year ago. For what reason do some societies take part in intercultural relations, but others are absent?
For What Reason Some intercultural relationships seem buzzing but others are missing? I believe that the result is hidden in dialectics: despite the fact that the personal image also preferences have every chance of fulfilling significant significance, the contexts in which societies also come across interact significantly contribute to the viability of intercultural friendship and romantic relationships. In such a Case, there are public, cult and educational contexts that have every chance of promoting or hindering intercultural relations. General historical and socio-political ties, in addition, are of significant importance. For example, a fifty-year-old back in total marriage among whites as well as African Americans was counter-legal. This, in the absence of hesitation, is considered one of the factors behind this, that the characteristics of interracial dating and alliances are the lowest among these two companies, as compared with the characteristics of other popular and also racial companies. With whom I choose friendship is determined as well as by our personal preferences, thus also by the social, cultic and socio-political context.
BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONSHIPS
Most people have a variety of intercultural relationships, which have every chance to differ according to the year, physiological capabilities, gender, national adaptation, class, faith, race or nationality. The potential benefits of ability as well in this relationship are enormous. The source for these relationships often lies in maintaining balance among differences as well as monotony. One of the samples is considered to be a relationship among Judith as well as an employee according to Chikane. If they collided for the first time, they dreamed that there was not enough common around them, since they existed as immigrants from very different national and civilized strata. However, just as soon as they revealed the totality in their own abstract labor, they revealed that in the very process there is a large number of one. For example, one and the other are committed from large church families, about two have a father and mother who have made a huge investment in their communities, and he and the other are similar to their own older sisters and nieces. As a result of these relationships, they also found out a large amount of the latest about various areas comrade comrade.
The virtues of such a relationship include (1) acquiring knowledge of the society around, (2) breaking standards and (3) acquiring new abilities. You will most likely be able to invent much more. In intercultural relations, I often see some information about unknown civilized modifications and styles.
Cross-cultural connections are special in numerous connections, and for this reason they make uncommon troubles. Concurring to the foundation, they are characterized by social contrasts within the sort of communication, values, and recognition. Contrasts are perhaps more obvious within the untimely stages of relationship arrangement, in case social orders are inclined to sharing the slightest sum of personal information. But, if a certain set is introduced, relationships are also formed due to the boundaries of the original measure, these civilized differences have every chance of having the least impact, due to the fact that all relationships, without exception, are made the most specific according to the verge of transition to the closest stages. It may seem at first glance that in intercultural relations there is a connection as well as differences, thus also similarities. Differences - given God-given, the goal is also capable of being in this, in order to identify and form similarities - a single circle of interests, influences, views or missions.
Negative standards are often applied in intercultural relationships. Standards are a method of categorizing data processing as well, however, they are harmful if they are negatively also firmly contained. In Some Cases, peoples need to function in order to acquire a mix, which can hinder the standard.
Another issue in intercultural relations is related to the uneasiness that social orders regularly feel at first. There's some uneasiness within the untimely stages of different connections, but the uneasiness is more noteworthy in intercultural connections. The energy comes from stressing around the likely negative consequences. We may be perplexed that we are going to see outlandish or annoy somebody in this case since of this, at that point that I am obscure with the style or civilization of this individual. Contrasts within the year, as a run the show, don't enact such uneasiness in any way, however, contrasts in physiological capabilities, lesson or race, more absolutely in common, actuate - concurring to the final line, within the starting arrange.
The level of uneasiness can be more in the event that one or these two edges have negative desires based on past help or measures. On the opposite, intercultural intuitive, in which one or these two edges don't have sufficient negative hopes too don't have negative past contacts, maybe enact the slightest uneasiness.
Equally As in the case of other issues, there are 3 communicative layouts for the study of intercultural relationships, anyone with which writes the original attachment to our representation of this, as well as I form and maintain relationships, regardless of the differences. The social science-based aspect reveals cross-cultural differences in this, as relationships are formed, and relationships are formed. The interpretive aspect thoroughly studies the nature of the given relationship and the significance that the relationship represents. The unfavorable aspect focuses on the impact of different contexts - institutional, socio-political as well as multi-significant - in helping / or resisting the formation and maintenance of intercultural relationships.
Clark-Ibáñez, M., & Felmlee, D. (2004). Interethnic relationships: The role of social network diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00021.x
OIP 117. Seals on the Persepolis Fortification Tablets, Volume I: Images of Heroic Encounter Mark B. Garrison and Margaret Cool Root
Martin, J. N., Bradford, L. J., Drzewiecka, J. A., & Chitgopekar, A. S. (2003). Intercultural Dating Patterns Among Young White U.S. Americans: Have They Changed in the Past 20 Years? Howard Journal of Communications, 14(2), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170304270
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.