Дата публикации: 16.11.2025
TEACHER TRAINING: GENERAL ISSUES OF CONTEMPORARY METHODS AND PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES
V.S. Shashkova
Makhambet Utemisov West Kazakhstan University, Uralsk, Kazakhstan
V.A. Razumovskaya
Professor, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Abstract
This paper examines contemporary approaches to teacher training in Kazakhstan with a particular focus on the development of professional competence in the context of evolving educational standards and digital transformation of pedagogy. The analysis consolidates recent empirical frameworks and theoretical contributions that conceptualize teacher development as a continuous, reflective, and multi-component process. The study highlights that effective training models prioritise competency-based development, integration of digital pedagogy, and methodical flexibility. The findings emphasise the need for a systemic approach to teacher preparation that extends beyond the acquisition of instructional tools and fosters adaptability, reflective practice, and pedagogical autonomy. The paper argues that the transformation of teacher training requires not only methodological innovation but also the reconfiguration of institutional support mechanisms that sustain long-term professional growth within the Kazakhstani context.
Keywords: teacher training, modern pedagogy, professional competence, Kazakhstan, digital pedagogy
Introduction
The rapid transformation of modern education in Kazakhstan necessitates a shift in the preparation and professional development of teachers. The expansion of digital learning environments, changes in student learning behaviours, and competence-oriented national educational standards (including the Teacher Professional Standard of Kazakhstan) require educators to continuously update their methodological repertoire. Traditional models of teacher training, which focused mainly on subject knowledge and static methodological frameworks, are no longer sufficient to meet the growing complexity of classroom practices (e.g., Darling-Hammond, 2021). As a result, teacher development in Kazakhstan is increasingly conceptualised not as a segment of pre‐service preparation but as an ongoing professional continuum. In this context, modern teacher training emphasises reflective practice, technological adaptability, and differentiated instruction as core dimensions of professional readiness.
Literature Review
Contemporary scholarship identifies several key directions in teacher preparation globally and within Kazakhstan. First, there is a shift from transmissive pedagogy toward constructivist and learner-centred models. According to Mishra and Koehler (2006), the TPACK framework shows that methodological competence now requires a synthesis of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge rather than isolated skill development. Similarly, recent studies argue that digitalisation expands the role of the teacher from knowledge transmitter to facilitator of learning trajectories (Koehler et al., 2022).
Second, professional competence is now interpreted through the lens of adaptability and reflexivity rather than procedural mastery. Darling-Hammond (2021) notes that continuous professional learning is integral to maintaining pedagogical relevance in rapidly transforming educational contexts.
Third, international studies emphasise competency-based teacher preparation as a structural response to changing educational demands. Research from the OECD (2020) confirms that teachers trained under flexible and practice-oriented models demonstrate higher instructional effectiveness compared to those operating within traditional prescriptive curricula.
Finally, emerging literature highlights institutional factors: teacher development is effective only when supported by systemic mentorship, peer collaboration, and an organisational culture oriented toward innovation (Fullan, 2020).
Within Kazakhstan:
-
Zhanguzhinova et al. (2018) analysed the formation of professionally-pedagogical competence in a Kazakhstani teacher‐training context and identified structural features of competence formation in vocational teacher preparation.
-
Kariyev, Sapieva & Topanova (2022) studied the effectiveness of advanced training courses for teachers in Almaty region and emphasised the need to align professional development with international standards.
-
Kurmasheva, Zhorabekova & Duisenova (2025) examined future foreign-language teachers’ professional-oriented competence in digital adaptive learning in Kazakhstan.
-
Mukhatayev et al. (2025) investigated the structure of methodological competence of university teachers in Kazakhstan and proposed levels of development in the digital pedagogy era.
Thus, modern teacher training in Kazakhstan encompasses not only methodological upgrading but also the cultivation of professional identity within adaptive learning environments aligned to global and national developments.
Methodology
This paper employs a qualitative analytical approach based on a comparative review of contemporary teacher training models and competency-based educational frameworks, with special focus on Kazakhstan. The methodology is structured around thematic synthesis of scholarly sources published between 2018 and 2025, emphasising empirical studies addressing teacher adaptability, reflective practice, and the integration of innovative methodologies into instructional design. The analysis focuses on identifying the systemic conditions under which teacher training becomes an enabler of sustained pedagogical development rather than a one-time procedural upgrade. The inclusion of both international and Kazakhstan-specific research allows for identifying gaps between global trends and localized implementation practices in developing educational systems.
Results and Discussion
The analysis reveals three major findings relevant to the Kazakhstani context:
-
Long-term professional growth rather than short-term qualification cycles.
Teacher training is most effective when embedded in a long-term model of professional growth rather than short-term qualification cycles. Competency-based preparation fosters not only the ability to apply new instructional strategies but also pedagogical autonomy. As Fullan (2020) emphasises, professional competence is sustained when teachers operate within reflective and collaborative learning cultures. This aligns with the Kazakhstan context, where recent educational reforms increasingly emphasise teacher self-development; however, institutional mechanisms for reflective practice remain underdeveloped. For instance, research from Western Kazakhstan found only a small number of teachers aware of or using competency frameworks in practice. -
Integration of digital pedagogy.
Technological literacy is no longer an optional professional supplement but a structural dimension of teaching competence. As Koehler et al. (2022) argue, teacher effectiveness today is contingent on technology-mediated pedagogical reasoning rather than mere tool-based familiarity. In Kazakhstan, for example, Kurmasheva et al. (2025) found that future foreign-language teachers placed higher priority on traditional methodological competences while hybrid/adaptive digital competences ranked lower, indicating an implementation gap. This suggests that training programmes must transcend software-oriented instruction and cultivate the capacity to design learning environments. -
Institutional support, mentorship and peer collaboration.
Models of teacher training grounded in mentorship and peer-based professional dialogue demonstrate higher sustainability than certification-based models. The OECD (2020) reports that teachers exposed to collaborative development frameworks maintain stronger professional identity and methodological resilience when confronted with changing instructional demands. In Kazakhstan, Kariyev et al. (2022) showed that advanced training courses had variable effectiveness unless aligned with international frameworks and underpinned by systemic supports. In essence, effective teacher training is not defined by the variety of instructional tools introduced but by the extent to which teachers are empowered to internalise professional growth as a continuous process.
Overall, the findings suggest that effective teacher training in Kazakhstan is shaped by the alignment of competency frameworks, digital pedagogy integration, and institutional support mechanisms that empower reflective professional agency rather than procedural compliance.
Conclusion
The study concludes that the modernization of teacher training in Kazakhstan requires a shift toward competency-based, reflective, and institutionally supported development models. Contemporary educational environments demand that teachers function as adaptive professionals capable of critically evaluating and redesigning instructional strategies. The effectiveness of teacher training is therefore determined not by exposure to isolated methodologies but by the creation of systemic conditions that cultivate professional autonomy, technological integration, and pedagogical reflexivity. For Kazakhstan’s education system navigating active transformation, the strategic priority lies in transitioning from certification-oriented preparation to long-term developmental ecosystems that sustain professional competence as a continuous trajectory rather than a finite training outcome.
References
-
Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Teachers College Press.
-
Fullan, M. (2020). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
-
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2022). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 1–17.
-
OECD. (2020). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2020 results: Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing.
-
Zhanguzhinova, M., Magauova, A., Kertayeva, K., Yessimova, D., Toktarbayev, D., & Kassenov, K. (2018). Formation of the professionally-pedagogical competence in preparation of future teachers in Kazakhstan. Society. Integration. Education. Vol. 1, 611-619. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3345
-
Kariyev, A., Sapieva, M., & Topanova, G. (2022). Research on the effectiveness of advanced training courses for teaching staff in Kazakhstan. Pedagogy and Psychology, 51(2), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.51889/2022-2.2077-6861.01 Kurmasheva, M., Zhorabekova, A., & Duisenova, M. (2025). Professional-oriented competence of future teachers in the context of digital adaptive learning. Pedagogy and Psychology, 63(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.51889/2960-1649.2025.63.2.013
-
Mukhatayev, A., Omirbayev, S., Biloshchytskyi, A., Kasenov, K., Toxanov, S., & Mukanova, S. (2025). The structure of methodological competence of university teachers and the levels of its development. Высшая школа Казахстана, (49–1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.59787/2413-5488-2025-49-1-129-138
-
(for further national reference) Ismagulova, A. E., Ryspayeva, D. S., Zholdabayeva, A. S., Kandalina, Y. M., Furman, O. V. (2023). Professional development needs of English teachers in Kazakhstan. Pedagogy Vestnik, 2023(2), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.31489/2023Ped2/154-164